Mail_Text

A Slice of Humble Pie

Thank you for Amie Barrodale’s article “La Pala” (Winter 2013). It reminded me of a passage from a book by Iris Murdoch, A Word Child: “Nothing humbles human pride more than inability to understand a language. It’s a perfect image of spiritual limitation. The cleverest man looks a fool if he can’t speak a language properly. . . . [God] wanted us to see that goodness is a foreign language.”

Lesley Woodward

Rocky River, OH

Comments_TextDoes Mindfulness Make for a Better “You”?

I’m a Buddhist meditator who teaches others, generally non-Buddhists, to meditate. The reflections and considerations in Linda Heuman’s interview with David McMahan (“Context Matters,” Winter 2013) precisely mirror the difficulties I have to work around. There is a conception that mindfulness makes for a better YOU, an approach that I have to navigate in introducing mindfulness so that eventually, insight can begin to stir.

My experience is that the unconditioned is outside cultural relativism, which, I think, is why I so often come across experiences in the sutras that seem to speak exactly to my own, and why I think of “enlightenment” as beyond language, beyond philosophy, and beyond constructed thought. Perhaps it’s useful to frame these discussions in terms of karma—our multilayered, self-proliferating habits and volitions but also our tradition, language, and culture—that we need to dispense with in order to reach liberation.

Ed Rowe

Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK

Change the World, Not Buddhism

I was very glad to see Linda Heuman’s interview with David McMahan, who identified the differences between what the Buddha taught—samma sati, or right mindfulness (wise and discerning ethical judgments)—and the stripped-down consumer version of mindfulness that is now part of the Western Buddhist menu (nonjudgmental awareness).

The problems inherent in a mindfulness practice that exists without an ethical and value-based ethos are just a slice of the Western Buddhist pie that needs to be examined carefully. I, for one, feel that the Buddha’s teachings are timeless and that the example of the renunciant monk holds a relevant place in a modern world increasingly bent on greed, anger, consumerism, and delusion. Buddhism need not fundamentally adapt and change to the modern world; instead, the modern world should pay some real attention to what the Buddha taught 2,600 years ago. While the Buddha embraced the idea that some aspects of practice could adapt to different cultures and times, at no time did he suggest that the dhamma be reformulated to suit modern tastes.

—Michael Roe

TweetUs 

Broke down and became a member of @tricyclemag, and now my work is suffering because I’m reading articles constantly

-Jennifer (@Juniper_Music)

Our condolences 😉 

-Tricycle Magazine (@tricyclemag

Must be a middle path in there somewhere. . . 😉 

-TheMosb (@themosb

 

Mindfulness becoming a folk religion of the secular elite in Western culture

-Tricycle Magazine (@tricyclemag)

Is it? Or is it “also”? 

-Monica Sanford (@dharmacowgirl

 

Send letters to editorial@tricycle.com, post a comment on tricycle.com, or tweet us at @tricyclemag.

Illustrations by Roberto La Forgia

Get Daily Dharma in your email

Start your day with a fresh perspective

a photo of a Buddhist meditating
Explore timeless teachings through modern methods.

With Stephen Batchelor, Sharon Salzberg, Andrew Olendzki, and more

See Our Courses

Thank you for subscribing to Tricycle! As a nonprofit, to keep Buddhist teachings and practices widely available.

This article is only for Subscribers!

Subscribe now to read this article and get immediate access to everything else.

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Log in.