Dharma Rain
Edited by Stephanie Kaza & Kenneth Kraft
Shambhala Publications:Boston, 2000
500 pp,; $16.95 (paper)

Ten years ago, Earth Day director Christina Desser proclaimed that from that day forward, the environment would be the screen through which all other decisions are made. The choices one makes about spiritual paths and the practice of Buddhism proves to be no exception. Buddhist practice cultivates a view of humanity and nature that is fundamentally ecological. It is through unremitting attentiveness that our perception opens to the interdependence and fragility of all life. Zen Master Eisai expressed it this way: “Because I am, heaven overhangs and earth is upheld. Because I am, the sun and the moon go round. The four seasons come in succession, all things are born, because I am, that is, because of Mind.”

Stephanie Kaza and Kenneth Kraft have done a great service in producing the most comprehensive gathering of Buddhist environmental resources to date in their new book, Dharma Rain. There is no lack of sources to inspire ecological awareness in early Buddhism, and Dharma Rain makes an important contribution by pulling together much of what is existent in one place.

Thorough as it is, the book sidesteps some fundamental issues in the eco-Buddhist discussion, and underrepresents its scope in other respects. Declaring as they do that the 1996 Harvard Conferences on Religion and Ecology inaugurated the field, the editors may have overlooked some earlier important contributions. David Barash published an article in 1973 entitled “The Ecologist as Zen Master” in which he discussed what he considered the remarkable parallels between Zen Buddhism and the then-emerging public concept of ecology. He felt that the interdependence and unity of all things was fundamental to both Zen practice and the science of ecology, and that they share a common non-dualistic view of the fundamental identity of subject and surroundings. He concluded that “the very study of ecology, is the elaboration of Zen’s nondualistic thinking.” In 1984, Robert Thurman’s and Carl Ruck’s ideas in On Nature from the Boston University series on philosophy and religion by L. S. Rouner were also seminal. From Sri Lanka in 1989 came Bellanwila Wimalaratanas book, Buddhism, Society and Environment and its capacious analysis of Buddhism’s understanding of the intricate web of life. Shann Davies’s 1985 book, Tree of Life: Buddhism and Protection of Nature, led the stream of recent publications on Buddhism and ecology.

In Part Two of Dharma Rain, “Contemporary Interpretations of the Teachings,” I would have liked to have seen an exploration into the scholarly debate that has arisen around the question of whether Buddhism is being tied too tightly to ecological concern. As Kenneth Kraft writes elsewhere, “seasoned Buddhist practitioners suspect that the comparisons between ecological awakening and a true enlightenment experience are too facile. Buddhist scholars in North America and Japan are asking if there a point at which the distance from traditional Buddhism becomes so great that the Buddhist label is no longer appropriate.”

Liberate this article!

This article is available to subscribers only. Subscribe now for immediate access to the magazine plus video teachings, films, e-books, and more.

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Log in.